Hi Steve, You are right - my suggestion does not involve openchange at all. Openchange would be certainly better option, but do you know anyone who has *working* openchange setup? In production?
Best Regards Martin. > On 10 Mar 2016, at 17:08, Steve Ankeny <[email protected]> wrote: > > Martin . . . > > Am I right in understanding your suggestion does not involve OpenChange? > Would that limit a user to Outlook 2013? It appears to require a lot of > resources to implement, and even then, there appear to be limitations. > > pg. 51-55, SOGo Installation and Configuration Guide > > From my view, this is certainly preferable to using OpenChange > > On 03/10/2016 10:44 AM, Martin Simovic wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I recommend you test your setup before the actual migration. ActiveSync can >> be very resource demanding, especially with large mailboxes. At the moment, >> every EAS connection requires a separate sogod process, which in your case >> means you need 32+ GB RAM - assuming your users use Outlook only (and not >> the phone, etc.) Add one more device per user (e.g. Android phone) and >> amount of required RAM duplicates. >> >> Best Regards >> Martin. >> >>> On 10 Mar 2016, at 15:36, EFEKT PAWKI < >>> <mailto:[email protected]>[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hello. >>> I have to migrate from Exchange 2003 to something else. >>> My users will kill me if I force them to switch from MS Outlook to >>> something else. >>> >>> How Sogo behave with account with a lot of data using Active Sync protocol? >>> Especially owner of company - he have 5GB of OST and 45 in PST. >>> >>> Calendar is full of meettings etc... >>> Will Sogo be able to work fluently with such amount of data? >>> There will be about 100 mailboxes. >>> Best regards. Pawel >>> -- >>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>> https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists <https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists> > > -- > [email protected] > https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
