On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 01:33:05PM +0100 you wrote: > It is here. We've been running v3 since its initial release and I > have never experienced any different behaviour.
Bad. > The appointments are correctly flagged as confidential (if you > examine the XML sent to the client) but I believe this should be > handled server-side (like it is with CalDAV) as I have yet to find a > client that honours this! It is also much safer if data never > intended for a client device is kept centrally and never distributed > to it... Fully agree. Why doesn't Inverse fix that? It should not be rocket science. MS-Outlook seems to handle that correct client-side. But leaking data will be misused some day... Greetings -- R. Cirksena -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
