Thanks for reply

Based on that logic you'll be using Mantis indefinitely (e.g. in 10 years) because new issues are created there

Simply request new issues are created at GitHub and if there are GitHub duplicate issues then cross-link the Mantis issue until the issue is resolved

If it takes 10 years to close all Mantis issues then no problem but at least you won't have made it hard for the community to create new issues for a further 10 years from now

FYI I have no affiliation with GitHub but I'm sure _any_ modern issue tracker will be a UX improvement on Mantis (sorry!). Also GitHub, GitLab et al. all offer a degree of content portability (e.g. issues) for 10 years from now when you move to the next issue tracker 🙂
//
Yours hopefully

On 22/05/2019 15:41, Francis Lachapelle ([email protected]) wrote:
Hi Lewis

On May 12, 2019, at 11:08 PM, Lewis Dexter Litanzios ([email protected]) 
<[email protected]> wrote:

Apologies if this has been mentioned before - I tried to search your mailing 
list archive but surprisingly no results

Why is SOGo not using GitHub Issues - you obviously host [c]ode there so why 
not use their vastly better issue tracker?

I just started vetting SOGo web mail as a Thunderbird replacement and created 
my first [i]ssue today. While interacting with GitHub's issue tracker is 
geneally pleasant UX using your issue tracker is painful! I made a typo in my 
issue which I want to correct and there doesn't even appear to be a way to edit 
the issue once submitted. This is basic stuff.

You have a great product and what seems to be the best chance of a FOSS gmail 
replacement - please prioritise making it as easy as possible for contributors, 
including a better way to report and manage issues

I have a ton of issues to report but unfortunately I'll seriously have to 
consider the time burden in future
I understand your concern. We're big fans of Github too. However, we started 
SOGo at about the same time Github was founded, and Mantis (the bug tracking 
system we use) seemed the best option; it was open source, mature, and could be 
deployed on-promise. A few years later, when we moved the source code to Github 
(anyone remembers monotone?), we decided to keep Mantis because of the enormous 
quantity of tickets already in our system.

Francis

--
logo <https://ldexterldesign.uk>
--
[email protected]
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Reply via email to