Thank you.
My problem has been solved.

Taisuke.

2021年9月28日(火) 16:01 Jan Høydahl <[email protected]>:

> What gets cached is a long value representing a timestamp.
> So all filter queries need to use the exact same rounding, e.g. NOW/DAY,
> else they won't hit the cache.
>
> Jan
>
> > 28. sep. 2021 kl. 03:37 skrev Taisuke Miyazaki <
> [email protected]>:
> >
> > Thanks, Markus.
> >
> > However, what I was wondering was whether the cache would work for a
> > mixture of special syntaxes like NOW/HOUR, NOW/DAY, and queries with
> > specific dates, respectively.
> > I'm wondering how it works when the firstSearcher uses NOW/DAY but the
> > actual query is searching for a specific date.
> >
> > Taisuke.
> >
> >
> > 2021年9月27日(月) 20:25 Markus Jelsma <[email protected]>:
> >
> >> Hello Taisuke,
> >>
> >> NOW is rounded down to the current millisecond and cannot be reused a
> >> millisecond later. You should always round NOW down to the minute or the
> >> hour, or you will pollute the cache.
> >>
> >> For example: date:[NOW-7DAY/HOUR TO NOW/HOUR] is cached and is reusable
> for
> >> at most one hour.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Markus
> >>
> >> Op ma 27 sep. 2021 om 13:15 schreef Taisuke Miyazaki <
> >> [email protected]>:
> >>
> >>> Hi.
> >>>
> >>> In fistSearcher and newSearcher, you can set up a query to warm up the
> >>> cache.
> >>> So, if I write a query like timelimit:[NOW/DAY TO NOW+7DAYS/DAY] and a
> >>> cache is created, and the following query comes in, will the cache be
> >> used?
> >>>
> >>> Suppose today is 2021/09/01
> >>> fq=timelimit:[2021-09-01T00:00:00Z TO 2021-09-08T00:00:00Z]
> >>>
> >>> In other words, even if I create a cache with a special syntax like
> >>> NOW/DAY, will the cache be used when requesting the expanded value?
> >>>
> >>> thanks,
> >>>
> >>> Taisuke
> >>>
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to