I made this work with 6.x but don’t remember the details, sorry. I think it 
wanted application/something, maybe the POST format. 

wunder

> On Sep 9, 2022, at 1:38 PM, Mikhail Khludnev <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hold on. JSON query DSL lets you pass quite long content via body. It
> should support {!mlt}. At least it's worth a try.!
> 
>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 2:53 PM Mikhail Khludnev <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Hello Batanun
>> I checked {!mlt} source code. It can't swallow external content. I've
>> found that Lucene XML parser
>> https://lucene.apache.org/core/9_1_0/queryparser/org/apache/lucene/queryparser/xml/CorePlusQueriesParser.html
>> is capable to handle <LikeThisQuery>. However, it's diverged and not
>> available in Solr out-of-the-box
>> https://solr.apache.org/guide/8_8/other-parsers.html#xml-query-parser
>> 
>> 
>>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 1:16 PM Batanun B <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> I'm evaluating if the MoreLikeThis (mlt) feature of solr can be useful
>>> for our editors when they are creating new content. We want to trigger this
>>> before the content has been inserted in the system, so there is no document
>>> in solr that we can use as a base for the mlt search. So we want to use the
>>> "externally supplied text" feature, where we provide the article text in
>>> the request body of the search. This works great when we use the mlt
>>> request handler (/mlt). But we also would like to get facets for this
>>> search, and bug SOLR-7883 is stopping us from doing that.
>>> 
>>> Some people suggest that we use the mlt query parser instead, as part of
>>> our regular request parser (/select). But I can't get that to work together
>>> with the "externally supplied text". It gives me the error "Bad contentType
>>> for search handler :text/plain".
>>> 
>>> So, does anyone know how to do a search that uses MoreLikeThis with
>>> externally supplied text, and facets at the same time?
>>> 
>>> Regards
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Sincerely yours
>> Mikhail Khludnev
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Sincerely yours
> Mikhail Khludnev

Reply via email to