Hi, Thanks for that background information. I don't really need separate lists at the moment. I can make do with these limitations of 6.6.6.
Thanks again Charlie On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 5:07 AM Mikhail Khludnev <[email protected]> wrote: > I suppose you are looking for functionality introduced at 7.5 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12361 which I call named > children. > Before 7.5 it was only single anonymous children list/dimension: > SID.addChildDocuments(). > Do you really need to distinguish children between a few lists (named > fields) at 6.6? > > > On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 4:57 AM Charlie Hubbard <[email protected] > > > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I'm not sure what you mean by "naming children" exactly. I don't have a > > stack trace, but this video discusses nested documents, and refers to > > enhanced support in 6.x so I know 6.x supports nested documents. > > > > https://youtu.be/qV0fIg-LGBE?t=446 > > > > Here is what is in the Solr 8 manual: > > > > > > > > - Even though child documents are provided as field values > > > syntactically and with SolrJ, it’s a matter of syntax and it isn’t > an > > > actual field in the schema. Consequently, the field need not be > > defined in > > > the schema and probably shouldn’t be as it would be confusing. There > > is no > > > child document field type, at least not yet. > > > > > > And in the Solr 6.6 manual: > > > > > Nested documents may be indexed via either the XML or JSON data syntax > > (or > > > using SolrJ) > > > <https://solr.apache.org/guide/6_6/using-solrj.html#using-solrj> > > > > > > However, no such example using SolrJ is included, leading me to look to > > other versions that document the feature better. Solr 6.6 manual does > > refer to the special field in JSON indexing `_childDocuments_`. It's not > > until Solr 8.7 manual does it provide an example of using Solrj to index > > nested child documents. > > > > https://solr.apache.org/guide/8_7/indexing-nested-documents.html > > > > The first example using SolrJ simply sets a field with a List of > > SolrInputDocuments which is what I'm doing. The 2nd uses a method on > > SolrInputDocument.addChildDocuments(Collection<SolrInputDocument>). I > see > > that method available on SolrJ for 6.x so I'm assuming that is supported. > > I'm just curious if someone knows if the first method should be supported > > or not? > > > > Charlie > > > > On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 3:36 PM Mikhail Khludnev <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > Hello Charlie. > > > My (just) guess is that the old version might not support naming > > children, > > > unless you can prove it. > > > If you share stacktrace with method names and line numbers it might > give > > a > > > clue regarding support for this functionality. > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 7:12 PM Charlie Hubbard < > > [email protected] > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > I'm encountering the following error when indexing a parent and > nested > > > > children documents. I'm using managed schemas, Solr 6.6.6, and Solrj > > to > > > > send the documents up to Solr for indexing. I have the default > > `_root_` > > > > field defined in the schema, and the parent document can be indexed > > > without > > > > issue. It's when I include the field `pages` that Solr complains. > > > > > > > > 1040R.pdf was rejected by the server for Error from server at > > > > http://localhost:8983/solr/mycollection: ERROR: > > > > [doc=08464756-4ecd-4758-b8cc-9575d8a922ce] multiple values > encountered > > > for > > > > non multiValued field pages: [SolrInputDocument(fields: > > > > > > > > Here is the structure I'm trying to upload (this is > > > > psuedocode/JSON-ish representation to help represent data, their data > > > > types, and structure. This is NOT literally what I'm sending). > > > > > > > > SolrInputDocument { > > > > id: '08464756-4ecd-4758-b8cc-9575d8a922ce', > > > > archiveDate_dt: "2023-04-08T12:23:43Z", > > > > _batchId: 251 > > > > _type: "document", > > > > .... > > > > *pages*: [ > > > > SolrInputDocument { > > > > id: "1c482d15-6dd2-4bb2-8583-59231aa8db9b", > > > > archiveDate_dt: "2023-04-08T12:23:43Z", > > > > _batchId: 251 > > > > _pageNumber: 1, > > > > _type: "page", > > > > content: "lorem ipsum dolor...." > > > > }, > > > > SolrInputDocument { > > > > ... > > > > }, > > > > ... > > > > ] > > > > } > > > > > > > > It clearly doesn't like the field `pages` which isn't defined in the > > > > schema, but reading the various documents from Solr seems like it > > doesn't > > > > need to be? That Solr should recognize the nested documents > contained > > > > within the embedded List and know what to do. Do I have that right? > > I'm > > > > piecing together information from several versions of Solr because > the > > > > 6.6.6 docs are pretty sparse about how things work, and later > versions > > > do a > > > > better job explaining it. > > > > > > > > What am I doing wrong? > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance > > > > Charlie > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Sincerely yours > > > Mikhail Khludnev > > > https://t.me/MUST_SEARCH > > > A caveat: Cyrillic! > > > > > > > > -- > Sincerely yours > Mikhail Khludnev > https://t.me/MUST_SEARCH > A caveat: Cyrillic! >
