@Rahul Surendran <rahul.surend...@tcs.com> facet indeed is where the time
is spent:

"process": {
          "time": 1560,
          "query": {
            "time": 10
          },
          "facet": {
            "time": 1545
          },

On Tue, Feb 13, 2024, 6:03 AM Rahul Goswami <rahul196...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Can you pass debug=true with your query to find out which phase  (query or
> faceting) takes more time? This is to eliminate chasing the wrong symptom
> to optimize for.
>
> -Rahul
>
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 3:48 AM Mikhail Khludnev <m...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hello, Arun.
> > Why don't you warm a new searcher with a query listener?
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 3:18 AM Arun Sudhir <arunsud...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > > We use solr for our search needs and we have documents indexed on a
> core
> > in
> > > multiple machines. Over time, the index on some machines has grown from
> > 30
> > > GB to 60 GB now to a giant 133 GB. While others are still hovering
> around
> > > 80GB, and some others are still under 30GB. We manually control which
> > > documents go into which machine and do not use SolrCloud.
> > >
> > > We have a field in our index which is a docValue. What we have noticed
> is
> > > that facet queries on this field take around 10 seconds for almost the
> > > first call every minute or so on the huge server machines which have
> ~130
> > > GB index size. We commit every minute on our servers as well. We have
> > > ensured that the machines do not starve on RAM and for the ones which
> > have
> > > 130 GB of index, we have 256 GB of RAM. So the segments are all in
> memory
> > > all the time.
> > >
> > > Still, we see every call made after a minute or so takes 10 seconds on
> > the
> > > big shards with index size close to 130 GB, 6 seconds on the shards
> that
> > > are 80GB, and less than 4 seconds on the normal shards whose size is
> less
> > > than 30 GB.
> > >
> > > How can we optimize and get rid of this latency? We have tried using
> > > DocValuesFormat=Direct, increasing the number of facet.threads,
> > increasing
> > > the heap size etc. Is there anything else we can do to get the
> > > performance of facet queries on the large shards to under 2 seconds?
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Arun
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sincerely yours
> > Mikhail Khludnev
> >
>

Reply via email to