Speaking of back compat... how many folks have pointed a 9.x solrj at a 10.x... I got an error right before I left for CoC that I didn't get to fully track down, but it was complaining that base url was null.
http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) https://a.co/d/b2sZLD9 (my fantasy fiction book) On Wed, Sep 10, 2025, 6:37 PM Chris Hostetter <hossman_luc...@fucit.org> wrote: > > : >> If we don't ship headline grabbing features in a major release, we > might as > : >> well abandon this project and dedicate our focus on building > OpenSearch or > : >> Elasticsearch. > : > : This brings up memories of the tragedy of Perl 6. > > +1. > > Features should be added because they are useful & desirable. > Features should be released when they are ready & stable. > > Our primary concerns for what changes go into each (semanticly) versioned > release should be based on stability, back compatability, and forward > compatibility -- not what kinds of headlines they will generate. > > > -Hoss > http://www.lucidworks.com/ >
