-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Nick Gilbert wrote: | Hi, | | Why do I get (VERY) different results on the same machine if I call | spamassassin in two different ways? Eg: | | spamassassin -D < spam.txt | | Gives: | | X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=10.8 required=5.0 | tests=AWL,HELO_DYNAMIC_COMCAST,INFO_TLD,RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100,RAZOR2_CHECK,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,
| | RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,URIBL_OB_SURBL,URIBL_SBL autolearn=unavailable | version=3.0.3 | | but: | | spamc < spam.txt | | gives: | | X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.8 required=5.0 | tests=HELO_DYNAMIC_COMCAST,INFO_TLD | autolearn=no version=3.0.3 | | Surely they should both give exactly the same result?
In an ideal world ;-) It looks like the checks not hitting when you use spamc are all network checks (razor and DNS checks). Perhaps the user running spamd has options disabling razor and other network checks in its user_prefs, or perhaps spamd has not been restarted since a change to include razor and DNS checks was made in local.cf?
If none of the above, the output from 'spamassassin -D --lint' run as the user controlling spamd might show something...
Kind Regards, Craig. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCf+XWMDDagS2VwJ4RAh2gAJ9F2iRvEiswS04y0BUTcvNdjYfyDQCdHob/ XZr9SX3++KydfN6UJChjB9w= =e9uB -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
