Hi, [cc'd to SATalk] On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 20:45:18 -0700 Jeff Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 6:57:12 PM, Bob Apthorpe wrote: > > You've sparked a thought. I'd rather not (badly) rewrite and maintain > > existing, tested code so maybe the right thing to do is take the > > comment, wrap it up as a mail message, feed it through spamassassin and > > parse the response for SURBL hits. Or SA score. Using a custom config > > file with no bayes or other network tests should keep the load down. > > > It's somewhat inelegant but it's a) a lot less work, b) more likely to > > succeed, and c) leverages all of SA, not just SURBL. The downside is > > that this method requires SpamAssassin with the SpamcopURI plugin to be > > installed, but since this only has to work for me right now and I only > > run two servers at home, I don't see that as a real problem. > > Justin Mason of SpamAssassin expressed that it would be > pretty easy to write a plugin for SA3 to dump URIs: I need to look into the new SA plugin architecture - I have a different project underway that looks at the ASNs of domains and IP addresses which could be very useful, especially if fed into bayes. [...] > > See also Ryan Thompson's geturi: I looked at that and whipped up the following: http://www.cynistar.net/~apthorpe/code/babycart/ By zeroing out a couple rules, I got most of what I wanted and a bit more. The trick now is to develop rules specific to comment spam (repurpose bayes?) and to further disable net tests. If you'ree wondering where the name comes from, see http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0463521/ <...gara gara gara...> -- Bob
