Yes. Although Microsoft has refused to disclose what they have
actually applied for patents on, their license only applies to specific
parts of Sender-ID, which seems to imply that they did not apply for
patents on SPF itself. In any case, it is certainly seems safe to
continue using SPF for now.
Kelson wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://apache.org/foundation/docs/sender-id-position.html
More like "Who needs patent problems?"
The position appears to be 100% on patents and licencing, not on the
technology or the concept.
Next question: presumably SPF, though now a subset of Sender-Id, is
still unencumbered, and thus usable in SA 3.0?
