Hey all, I noticed when SpamAssassin mangles the original email, the original headers are NOT included in the main email. This gets annoying as some mail clients (at least pine) don't show the headers when you view the attachment. Is there a fix to allow the full headers to show through in the markup'd version?

-Dan

For example:

From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 3 16:31:27 2004
Received: from localhost by prime.gushi.org
        with SpamAssassin (2.63 2004-01-11);
        Fri, 03 Sep 2004 16:31:35 -0400
From: Michelle Latta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ortizj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: *****SPAM***** Re: testing
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2004 16:31:36 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on prime.gushi.org
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=5.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_40,HTML_MESSAGE,
        HTML_TITLE_EMPTY,RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK,RCVD_IN_NJABL,RCVD_IN_NJABL_DIALUP,
        RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.63
X-Spam-Level: *****
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_4138D4A7.75C63984"

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------------=_4138D4A7.75C63984
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Spam detection software, running on the system "prime.gushi.org", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or block
similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for details.

Content preview:  > Hey, > > Well I'm sorry you are so down. working at
  blockbuster would have > been cool. Have you called them back? You know
  just to check? > > > > You really didn't explain much about the
  "original reason" but I'll > assume its the IM thing that Mark and I
  did... Yes it was not just > me... and I was not the only one typing on
  the keyboard. I told you I > was just having fun and that was that..
  you even laughed... and Mark > helped in the silliness... I apologized
  that the comments that I made > in my opinion were harmless and just
  silly, Its difficult for me to > understand why you go so upset, you
  said some stuff about "is that how > you see me" and that is what I
  don't entirely understand, but > regardless you have to admit you had
  control of the situation... and > it goes beyond the normal "I'm
  bigger" thing which I only do because > its funny and you very
  obviously enjoy. You contributed!!! This may be > difficult for you to
  admit to but you had control and could have > stopped it if you really
  wanted to... Firstly, you text messaged > Juston... you told him you
  were me, that confirmed that it was you on > the computer.... you could
  have instead of you really wanted to end > the silliness Texted "Hi its
  Michelle and Jeremy is on my computer > ignore him and his antics,
  thanks." that would have ended things with > out any confrontation,
  physical confrontation as it is that you use > as your only defense on
  the subject... and you didn't bother to even > try and get me off the
  computer... in the end you did and I got off I > may add with out any
  confrontation. I realize that my past actions may > have led you to
  believe it was a pointless gesture to try and get me > off the
  computer. So in that I can somewhat understand your point... > but I'd
  also like to point out that in most other things you have > asked of me
  to not do ,as in change my normal "behavior" I have > acquiesced to
  your requests, that is to say that I call before I come > over or I IM
  you to see if its ok and mostly I don't even go on your > c [...]

Content analysis details:   (5.2 points, 5.0 required)

 pts rule name              description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 0.1 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
-0.0 BAYES_40               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 44%
                            [score: 0.4281]
 0.1 HTML_TITLE_EMPTY       BODY: HTML title contains no text
 3.5 RCVD_IN_NJABL_DIALUP   RBL: NJABL: dialup sender did non-local SMTP
                            [24.186.203.98 listed in dnsbl.njabl.org]
 0.1 RCVD_IN_SORBS          RBL: SORBS: sender is listed in SORBS
                            [24.186.203.98 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
 0.1 RCVD_IN_NJABL          RBL: Received via a relay in dnsbl.njabl.org
                            [24.186.203.98 listed in dnsbl.njabl.org]
 2.6 RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK      RBL: Sent directly from dynamic IP address
                            [24.186.203.98 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
-1.3 AWL                    AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment

The original message was not completely plain text, and may be unsafe to
open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a virus,
or confirm that your address can receive spam.  If you wish to view
it, it may be safer to save it to a file and open it with an editor.


------------=_4138D4A7.75C63984 Content-Type: message/rfc822; x-spam-type=original Content-Description: original message before SpamAssassin Content-Disposition: attachment Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from tenthplanetart.com (ool-18bacb62.dyn.optonline.net [24.186.203.98])
(authenticated bits=0)
by prime.gushi.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i83KV967046019;
Fri, 3 Sep 2004 16:31:13 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2004 16:31:36 -0400
From: Michelle Latta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ortizj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: testing
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Security: MIME headers sanitized on prime.gushi.org
See http://www.impsec.org/email-tools/sanitizer-intro.html
for details. $Revision: 1.139 $Date: 2003-09-07 10:14:23-07 X-Security: The postmaster has not enabled quarantine of poisoned messages.
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="------------040206020508070404020008"
X-Envelope-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------040206020508070404020008
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit




Hey,

Well I'm sorry you are so down. working at blockbuster would have


--

[23:49:00] LarpGM: Did my little TP comment scare you off?
[23:49:22] ilzarion: no, the shrieking retarded child eating people did

-Feb 06, 2001, times apparent.


--------Dan Mahoney-------- Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM Site: http://www.gushi.org ---------------------------



Reply via email to