I figured is you were gonna start another group flame war, we should do it correctly.
1) SA should block viruses 2) Top posting makes girlz hot! 3) All lists need tags in subject. 3b) All democrats sell poison milk to school children. 5) OMGHI2U!!!!1111one!!GOTPICS? 6) abortion 7) Afirmitive action 8) the pope listens to JayZ. 9) Guns kill people, not puppies. 10) Jello shouldn't be a food. Now THATS how you start a flame war!!! Woot! :-) --Chris >-----Original Message----- >From: Carnegie, Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 4:04 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: [SA-LIST] RE: Subject line > > >Why not just do it then. If others want to, then they will follow. If >not so be it. > >I will create a rule to move it along with the other(s) that I have to >move email from this list. > >-----Original Message----- >From: Jeff Koch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 1:58 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: Subject line > > > > >I certainly agree with a simple [SA} prefix so that the SA emails don't >get >lost and deleted with all the other stuff I get. However, this >came up a > >few months ago and the SA list nazis decided that we must be too stupid >not >to have programmed our email clients to automatically sort our email. >Those >of us in favor got voted down. > >I think this is a majority rules - minority rights things. Not >having a >prefix just makes it extra hard for many of us. > > >At 01:15 PM 9/14/2004, you wrote: >>Would it be possible to have emails to this list have >something such as > >>"[SA-LIST} Subject here" in the subject line for easier >sorting of the >>emails in folders? This is actually the first list am using that >doesn't >>have anything unique in the subject. >> >>Thanks, >>Predrag >> >>> > >Best Regards, > >Jeff Koch, Intersessions > > >
