Hi, I just got a nigerian spam with a huge Reply-To: line!
Never seen that trick before, but I suppose it works with quite a few of
the recipients. Should we create a new rule for that? I can't think of a
legitimate reason to have more than one address in the Reply-To line, right?
Here goes a sample:
From: chukwuelofu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: undisclosed-recipients: ;
Subject: I want to be your future partner/Response
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
...
From The Desk Top Of
Prof. Chukwu Elofu,
MD/CEO Financial Consultant,
Federal Republic Of Nigeria.
ATTN:
I have interest of investing in your country as such I
decided to establish contact with you for assistance
as soon as I am able to transfer my funds for this
...
--
o _ _ _
------- __o __o /\_ _ \\o (_)\__/o (_) -o)
----- _`\<,_ _`\<,_ _>(_) (_)/<_ \_| \ _|/' \/ /\\
---- (_)/ (_) (_)/ (_) (_) (_) (_) (_)' _\o_ _\_v
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Local Area Network in Australia: the LAN down under.
