On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 03:30:36PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote: > Shouldn't the SA build & test process be a little more verbose about > this, though, and at least spit out some warnings about missing Perl > modules? While the dnsbnl tests may not be necessary for SA to work, > it's certainly a lot more effective with them.
That's just it though -- it's optional, as you've stated. Just because it makes SA more effective doesn't make it required. ;) -- Randomly Generated Tagline: "Holy DNS batman, you aren't on my list!" - Error message
pgpTlTYMDAYCR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
