On Wed, 2004-09-22 at 01:53 +0300, Quinn Comendant wrote: > Help please. > > On our server we've noticed many scores like the following: > > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on ns.strangecode.com > X-Spam-Report: > * 0.0 RCVD_IN_SORBS_MISC RBL: SORBS: sender is open proxy server > * [212.43.204.77 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] > * 0.7 RCVD_IN_DSBL RBL: Received via a relay in list.dsbl.org > * [<http://dsbl.org/listing?ip=212.43.204.77>] > * 2.3 RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY RBL: NJABL: sender is an open proxy > * [212.43.204.77 listed in combined.njabl.org] > * 0.1 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP > address > * [212.43.204.77 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] > * 1.7 RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL RBL: NJABL: dialup sender did non-local SMTP > * [212.43.204.77 listed in combined.njabl.org] > X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=4.9 required=2.9 tests=RCVD_IN_DSBL, > RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL,RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL, > RCVD_IN_SORBS_MISC autolearn=no version=2.64 > > > Where users on dynamic IPs are blocked because once their IP was used > maliciously, but they themselves (and virtually 100% of the people > assigned that dynamic IP) are innocent. > > What is the best method to remove dynamic IP triggers? I could just find > all the triggers that are related and give them low scores, but I don't > know what all of them are, and that just seems the wrong way to go about it. > > What to do here??? > > -Quinn >
You should increase your spam threshold instead of trying to adjust the scores assigned to dynamic IPs. > -- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions http://www.blacknight.ie 059 9137101 -- Email scanned by Blacknight for viruses and dangerous content. Visit http://www.blacknight.ie for more information
