Sandy S scribbled on Thursday, September 23, 2004 8:52 AM: > I'm in the process of upgrading to Spamassassin 3.0 and am > currently running > my email through the new version of Spamassassin. I just had > an email slip > through that should have been caught by the URIDNSBL lookups - it's > listed in all of the URI blacklists.
<*snip*> > > In this case it correctly extracted the domain to query as > bestwneiis.info. > > Is this a bug or is there something I missed as I was > RTFMing? Thanks for > any help on this! > > Sandy S. Sandy, Can't help with your original problem without more info but Ulysses did point out another problem and I see the same here. You are listed with three URI's I use. You may want to find out why. I had to retrieve this post from my spam box. If Ulysses hadn't responded, I would have never seen this. Here's the header of your message on my box. From: "Sandy S" <sandys-munged-boreal.org> To: <[email protected]> Subject: {Spam?} Problems with URIDNSBL Under Spamassassin 3.0? Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 10:52:03 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-AIAInsurance-MailScanner-Information: Please contact MIS for more information X-AIAInsurance-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-AIAInsurance-MailScanner-SpamCheck: spam, SpamAssassin (score=8.476, required 6, BAYES_01 -1.52, OB_URI_RBL 4.00, SPAMCOP_URI_RBL 3.00, WS_URI_RBL 3.00) X-AIAInsurance-MailScanner-SpamScore: 8 X-MailScanner-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-MailScanner-To: kgoods-munged-aiainsurance.com Regards, Ken Ken Goods Network Administrator AIA Insurance, Inc.
