On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 03:07:08PM -0700, Kelson wrote: > > (Developers: It might be worth mentioning the minimum 3.0-compatible > versions for MD, Amavis, and other popular things-that-call-SA.) >
Why? How are developers supposed to know what "popular" versions of software support/use SpamAssassin and what the minimum supported version is? Besides, who gets to decide what the definition of popular is? Michael
