Can you post your local.cf file? Maybe one of the rules has a typo that is
sending it to parts unknown. We've seen something like that before. Are you
running bayes and awl?

--Chris

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Luis Hernán Otegui [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 11:52 AM
>To: Chris Santerre
>Cc: Matt Kettler; users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: SA 3.0 is eating up all my memory!!!
>
>
>ok, all I had in the /etc/mail/spamassassin dir was my local.cf and
>the init.pre. I've cleaned the local.cf according to the list of
>obsolete rules and directives, and still it is eating as much memory
>as it can...
>No idea why, the setup is the same as for another 4 production
>servers, it started all when I upgraded to 3.0...
>
>
>On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 11:05:40 -0400, Chris Santerre
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Something is seriously wrong with your setup! Move all cf 
>files except
>> local.cf out of the
>> /etc/mail/spamassassin dir and restart spamd. What does it read then?
>> 
>> There is no way spamd should be that large!!
>> 
>> --Chris
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >From: Luis Hernán Otegui [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 11:00 AM
>> >To: Matt Kettler
>> >Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>> >Subject: Re: SA 3.0 is eating up all my memory!!!
>> >
>> >
>> >Just a little update, this is what's going on over the server:
>> >
>> > 11:59am  up 16:12,  1 user,  load average: 10,51, 5,30, 2,47
>> >151 processes: 144 sleeping, 6 running, 1 zombie, 0 stopped
>> >CPU states:  6,5% user,  2,1% system,  0,0% nice, 91,3% idle
>> >Mem:   449484K av,  444476K used,    5008K free,       0K
>> >shrd,      12K buff
>> >Swap:  265032K av,  263440K used,    1592K free
>> >   24896K cached
>> >
>> >  PID USER     PRI  NI  SIZE  RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM   
>TIME COMMAND
>> > 9295 spamd     15   0 90604  79M  4788 S     0,0 18,1   0:09 spamd
>> > 9293 spamd     15   0 90228  78M  4908 S     0,0 17,9   0:09 spamd
>> > 9289 spamd     18   0 90248  66M  3924 S     0,0 15,2   0:09 spamd
>> > 9298 spamd     15   0 22808  14M  4764 S     0,0  3,2   0:00 spamd
>> > 9296 spamd     15   0 22904  14M  4744 S     0,0  3,2   0:00 spamd
>> > 9291 spamd     15   0 22896  14M  4732 S     0,0  3,2   0:00 spamd
>> > 9297 spamd     15   0 23008  14M  4740 S     0,0  3,2   0:00 spamd
>> > 9292 spamd     16   0 22480  13M  4856 S     0,0  3,1   0:00 spamd
>> > 9294 spamd     15   0 22460  13M  4800 S     0,0  3,0   0:00 spamd
>> > 9299 spamd     15   0 22440  13M  4908 S     0,0  3,0   0:00 spamd
>> > 9302 spamd     15   0 22808  12M  4636 D     0,0  2,9   0:00 spamd
>> > 9300 spamd     15   0 22524  12M  4720 D     0,7  2,8   0:00 spamd
>> > 9301 spamd     15   0 22460  12M  4652 D     0,1  2,7   0:00 spamd
>> > 9290 spamd     15   0 22704 9628  3760 S     0,0  2,1   0:00 spamd
>> > 7844 apache    15   0  7708 7204  6336 S     0,0  1,6   0:04 httpd
>> > 7437 apache    15   0  7488 7008  4916 S     0,1  1,5   0:04 httpd
>> > 7564 apache    15   0  7520 7008  4840 S     0,0  1,5   0:04 httpd
>> >
>> >I mean, 80 MB for the master spamd porcess? How do I limit this?
>> >
>> >On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 10:37:05 -0300, Luis Hernán Otegui
>> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> ok, the virus warning issues have been solved, but NOT the
>> >fact that I
>> >> have 22 copies of spamd running at the same time, even when I´ve
>> >> limited the number of max children of Sendmail to 20, and
>> >each copy of
>> >> spamd weights 21 MB! How can I limit the amount of memory spamd is
>> >> chewing?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 21:05:29 -0400, Matt Kettler
>> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> > At 07:29 PM 9/30/2004, Luis Hernán Otegui wrote:
>> >> > >warning: rule 'VIRUS_WARNING_MYDOOM_BNCE' is over 22 chars
>> >> > >lint: 51 issues detected.  please rerun with debug
>> >enabled for more
>> >> > >information.
>> >> > >
>> >> > >I have an antivirus running as a milter, how do I disable
>> >the virus
>> >> > >tests in SA, and also, why do I have this warnings?
>> >> >
>> >> > Those aren't virus tests, those are tests for "Someone
>> >sent a virus using
>> >> > your address and my virus scanner is stupidly telling you
>> >about it" type
>> >> > emails.
>> >> >
>> >> > They are also not a part of spamassassin's default rules,
>> >they are an add
>> >> > on called bogus-virus-warnings.cf .
>> >> >
>> >> > If you don't want the ruleset, remove it. Otherwise update
>> >it from it's source:
>> >> > http://www.timj.co.uk/linux/bogus-virus-warnings.cf
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> -------------------------------------------------
>> >> GNU-GPL: "May The Source Be With You...
>> >> -------------------------------------------------
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >--
>> >-------------------------------------------------
>> >GNU-GPL: "May The Source Be With You...
>> >-------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> 
>
>
>
>-- 
>-------------------------------------------------
>GNU-GPL: "May The Source Be With You...
>-------------------------------------------------
>

Reply via email to