On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Chris Santerre wrote:
> > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: scohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 4:35 PM > >To: Chris Santerre > >Cc: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail) > >Subject: RE: scan times up! > >I haven't been reading this list for a couple of weeks. Are you > >seriously saying that in order to get good performance out > >SA3.0 you have > >to disable bayes and only run 4 children? With the complaints of poor > >performance and increased memory usage is there any reason to > >put this on > >a production system? > > > > Good grief NO! You read this wrong. I'm running it on a system that > archeologists are interested in! I think the Boston Computer museum left me > a message wanting to take the system away! Hell I'm running on a system that > couldn't run a PC game from 2 years ago!! 3.0 caused my old iron to hit > swap a lot at busy times. It's not SA's fault, but my budget of $10.99 that > causes it :) > > --Chris (Seriously, my 4 yr old has a computer twice as powerful!) > Thanks for the reply. So what's with the SA eats all my memory thread and the memory footprint thread? Those two threads and your Scan times up thread makes it seem that there are problems. Steve Cohen
