Whoever configured SA for [EMAIL PROTECTED] must have either modified
the points or lowered the "required" limit.
I ran my_rules_du_jour this morning and the SA report in your mail, as it got
to my Inbox was :
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DRUGS_ERECTILE,
USER_IN_WHITELIST_TO autolearn=no version=2.63
I have no idea where the "CIALIS2" rule comes from ?
- Rķkharšur
-----Original Message-----
From: Ron McKeating [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 October, 2004 3:40 PM
To: EGILSSON Rikhardur, EXD/ITN/CSO
Cc: spam
Subject: RE: [Fwd: Better check your sig now you are a spammer :-)]
On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 14:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=4.0 required=4.0 tests=CIALIS2 autolearn=no
> version=2.64
> X-Spam-Report:
> * 4.0 CIALIS2 BODY: Contains the word "cialis".
>
>
> This is not a SA problem, this is a "User Problem".
>
> Whoever creates a word-matching rule that, alone, gives the required
> number of points to flag a mail as Spam, deserves what he gets (or
> gets not, as in this example).
>
So where did this rule come from ?
> Antidrug only applies 1.5 points for finding /\bCialis\b/I
>
> - Rķkharšur
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ron McKeating [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 06 October, 2004 3:01 PM
> To: spam
> Subject: [Fwd: Better check your sig now you are a spammer :-)]
>
>
> Nigel M kindly sent me this. we will have to think of new job titles
> unless SA can detect the difference between specialist and cialis.
> Ooops now nobody will see this email.
>
> Ron
--
Ron McKeating
Senior IT Services Specialist
Internet Services and Software Solutions
Loughborough University
01509 222329
