also sprach Jeff Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.12.1115 +0200]: > It's been mentioned before several times on this list. Otherwise > all I can say is that it's standard practice. :-)
Well, I am not here to argue, but apparently the anti-spam lists to which I subscribe do not follow the standards then. > FWIW, the usual sequence in reporting new (undetected) classes of > spam is: > > 1. Post an instance of it on this discussion list. Post an instance of it to a pastebin, e.g http://rafb.net/paste or better, an SA-specific pastebin on sa.apache.org (to be created), and send the link here. > 2. Someone else feeds it into their SpamAssassin to see if they > can duplicate the results (i.e. non-detection). If so then it's > considered a real new case that probably should be handled but > isn't. wget -O - http://url/to/paste | spamc and so on. -- martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.) \____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; [EMAIL PROTECTED] invalid/expired pgp subkeys? use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver! spamtraps: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "if ever somethin' don't feel right to you, remember what pancho said to the cisco kid... `let's went, before we are dancing at the end of a rope, without music.'" -- sailor
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
