On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 11:56:52AM -0700, Justin Mason wrote: > Will Yardley writes: > > On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 10:22:01AM -0700, Justin Mason wrote: > > > Will Yardley writes:
> > > > Has anyone else seen a problem w/ spamd dying sometimes (after > > > > working for a while)? I have been seeing this in the 3.0 rcs. > > > > I'm about to upgrade to 3.0 release, but I'm wondering if anyone > > > > else has seen this. > > > > Much more detailed information in bug #3667 > > > I'm almost certain it's a fixed bug. > > I don't have any more useful information yet (strace output), but I > > /am/ seeing this with SA 3.0 release. > > What will provide the most useful information for debugging this? > > Should I run the daemon in debug mode, or just run strace on it and > > see what happens when it dies? > *both* would provide info that will help. ;) The strace thing didn't work out, because it takes so long for spamd to die, and the strace output is (of course) quite verbose, at least if I follow child processes. I'm assuming that running strace on the master processes (which don't seem to die) won't help much. Spamd has still been dying pretty consistently on me - takes a few days to happen. This is the last reference I see to spamd in the logs... didn't notice anything unusual. .... Oct 12 06:22:27 drama spamd[21120]: logmsg: identified spam (10.4/2.7) for dallas:10000 in 4.3 seconds, 3969 bytes. Oct 12 06:22:27 drama spamd[21120]: identified spam (10.4/2.7) for dallas:10000 in 4.3 seconds, 3969 bytes. Oct 12 06:22:27 drama spamd[21120]: logmsg: result: Y 10 - BAYES_99,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL,HTML_50_60,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16,HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_02,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TEXT_AFTER_BODY,HTML_TEXT_AFTER_HTML,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_SBL,SPF_HELO_FAIL,URIBL_OB_SURBL,URIBL_SBL,URIBL_WS_SURBL scantime=4.3,size=3969,mid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,bayes=1,autolearn=no Oct 12 06:22:27 drama spamd[21120]: result: Y 10 - BAYES_99,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL,HTML_50_60,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16,HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_02,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TEXT_AFTER_BODY,HTML_TEXT_AFTER_HTML,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_SBL,SPF_HELO_FAIL,URIBL_OB_SURBL,URIBL_SBL,URIBL_WS_SURBL scantime=4.3,size=3969,mid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,bayes=1,autolearn=no (message then appears to be successfully delivered to the user). After this, there are no spamd references in the log until I restart spamd.
