>-----Original Message----- >From: Mathieu Nantel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 2:32 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: [OFFTOPIC] Opinions on DSPAM > > >Good day list, > >As I've read a few articles on DSPAM claiming that it's >better/faster/sexier >than spamassassin, I would appreciate having this list's >comment on DSPAM.
Which version of SA? If they are claiming better then 3.0 I think they are full of it. Does DSPAM use SURBL? If someone uses SA 3.0 w/ SURBL and also RDJ to update files from SARE, then IMHO bayes isn't needed. So it becomes 'almost' a "set it and forget it" function to use SA. I would like to know how one can be better/sexier then that. Faster.....well that might be. --Chris
