I've just installed SpamAssassin 3.0.0 under Windoze. It appears to be
working as documented. However, I'm uncertain what I've done to make SPF
checking not function. Network stuff appears OK because:
a) it takes a while to run (ca. 5 seconds) and
b) Blacklists work (I see headers like: X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.4
required=5.0
tests=ADDRESS_IN_SUBJECT,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,NOR
MAL_HTTP_TO_IP,RCVD_IN_SBL,URIBL_SBL autolearn=no version=3.0.0)
All .cf files are untouched since the install program did whatever it did to
them (most notably putting [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the Report text -
Cool!).
Setup, vanilla.
ActivePerl: This is perl, v5.8.4 built for MSWin32-x86-multi-thread.
SpamAssassin: SpamAssassin version 3.0.0 | running on Perl version 5.8.4
Box: Windoze 2K Server, SP4. Running IMail 8.13, Spamassassin and M$ DNS.
No other duties.
Running the ActivePerl version with the -D switch on the IMail D...SMD file
shows:
debug: config: read file C:\Perl\site/share/spamassassin/25_spf.cf
... 16 lines hidden
debug: plugin: loading Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SPF from @INC
debug: plugin: registered Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SPF=HASH(0x2950f4c)
... 60 lines hidden
debug: registering glue method for check_for_spf_helo_pass
(Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SPF=HASH(0x2950f4c))
debug: SPF: checking HELO (helo=acshub02.cancer.org, ip=12.168.24.151)
debug: SPF: trimmed HELO down to 'cancer.org'
>>>>>> debug: SPF: cannot load or create Mail::SPF::Query module <<<<<
What's this [db]
... 4 lines hidden
debug: registering glue method for check_for_spf_softfail
(Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SPF=HASH(0x2950f4c))
>>>>>> debug: SPF: cannot get Envelope-From, cannot use SPF <<<<<
What's this [db]
debug: registering glue method for check_for_spf_pass
(Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SPF=HASH(0x2950f4c))
debug: registering glue method for check_for_spf_helo_softfail
(Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SPF=HASH(0x2950f4c))
debug: registering glue method for check_for_spf_helo_fail
(Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SPF=HASH(0x2950f4c))
Inbound email headers (pbarker DOES NOT work at cancer.org - visioncomm.com
DOES publish v=spf1 +mx -all):
Received: from acshub02.cancer.org [12.168.24.151] by visioncomm.net with
ESMTP
(SMTPD32-8.13) id AF9C1B005E; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 10:13:48 -0400
Received: from Dan Barker ([10.110.23.50])
by acshub02.cancer.org (Lotus Domino Release 6.5.1)
with SMTP id 2004101810133993-253022 ;
Mon, 18 Oct 2004 10:13:39 -0400
From: Pam Barker<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC:
Subject: Test message
X-Mailer: NetMasters SMTP Demo
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on ACSHUB02/ACS/US(Release 6.5.1|January
21, 2004) at
10/18/2004 10:13:40 AM,
Serialize by Router on ACSHUB02/ACS/US(Release 6.5.1|January 21, 2004)
at
10/18/2004 10:13:41 AM,
Serialize complete at 10/18/2004 10:13:41 AM
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 10:13:40 -0400
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.0 (2004-09-13) on
mail.visioncomm.net
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=ham
version=3.0.0
X-RCPT-TO: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Status: U
X-UIDL: 397683681
Note: Notes won't accept email without a HELO. I used "Dan Barker". That's
why my name is in the headers. The messages should get an SPFFail because
visioncomm.com doesn't deliver via acshub02.cancer.org.
I can do a tcpdump on this, but I bet I'd not see a thing. It's most likely
a trivial configuration boo-boo (like the wrong Perl?).
tia,
Dan Barker
