>-----Original Message----- >From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 4:11 PM >To: Chris Santerre; [email protected] >Subject: RE: Question about spamassassin system wide > > >At 03:39 PM 10/20/2004, Chris Santerre wrote: >>Matt forgot about mimedefang. Which I only hear great things about. >>Otherwise I would go with the milter. > >Technically speaking, mimedefang is a milter. But you are correct.. >Mimedefang is a pretty cool tool.
LOL, you geek ;) Yeah after I hit send I thought, "Oh that is a milter. I wonder how fast until someone points out my booboo." > >Personally I like MailScanner, but that's just based on my >liking of the >ability to manage the number of inbound MTAs separately from >the number of >SA scanning processes. High-rate bursts mostly impact my queue >depth, not >my memory usage. > >All the integration tools have their strengths and weaknesses. >Pick the one >that does what you need. > >(One of MailScanner's weaknesses is lack of ability to do a SMTP layer >reject based on SA. Something MimeDefang is capable of.) Which is a very cool thing to reject on. But then you have to decide if rejects cause very bad FPs that you will never see :) Oh the choices! Fighting spam is ilke one big fun game! Should I take the body armour, or the parachute? --Chris
