--- Gavin Cato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This is what I don't get. If you can handle an avg of 500/hr, which....
> oh,
> > wait... that's per hour. Ah, OK. That's 8/min. I'm doing an avg of
> 48/min
> > (255/min max). But I swear someone else had a throughput higher than
> that
> > who was not having CPU issues.
> >
> > ANYONE? What kind of throughput are people able to get from SA on a
> single
> > processor machine?
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm averaging 89 a minute on the previously mentioned dual 1.1ghz P3 - I
> know it's not single CPU but to be honest I'd have expected a single 2.8 to
> be faster.
Yikes. Maybe I got too excited (about just adding hardware) too soon. I
agree that a 2.8 (HT no less) should be at least as fast, although 45 is my
average and although it's not as easy to just get an average for peak hours,
I think my daytime average is more like 75 or possibly as many as yours.
89 a minute! Wow! What else do you run on that machine? (Do you run your
other email server software there or is it a dedicated SA box? Do you also
run a virus scanner for example?)
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
