On Monday, April 12, 2004, 4:58:08 PM, David Funk wrote: > This looks like a poor test choice on the part of the authors. > It's failing because that addres "[211.147.224.30]" is no longer in > the sc.surbl.org list.
> They should use the specific "test" address that is guaranteed > to be there. Try rewriting that test line to use: > ['http://127.0.0.2/baddy'] > and see if that fixes it. Thanks Dave, We've added a numeric testpoint to the SURBL zone files at Eric Kolve's request, and I have a hunch he is updating the test suite to use it as we speak: Name: 2.0.0.127.sc.surbl.org Address: 127.0.0.2 We announced this addition on our announce list. :-) http://lists.surbl.org/ Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.surbl.org/
