Im using 3.0.. How do I get a hold of  SURBLs ? Im still getting a lot of
the vicodin and medicine spam mail :(

-----Original Message-----
From: Rakesh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Sábado, 06 de Noviembre de 2004 10:29 a.m.
To: Anton Krall
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Rules List

hii,

which version of spamassassin are you using ? I would recommend to remove
uri rulesets like bigevil and sare URI and use SURBLs instead, tht will help
you to get rid of great deal of spams. If you are using older version of
spamassassin like 2.63 then you will have to install the SpamCop URI plugin
or else upgrade to Spamassassin 3.x. Also try to use dcc and razor if you
are not using tht.

Rakesh

On Sat, 2004-11-06 at 21:41, Anton Krall wrote:
> Guys.
> 
> I am using the following rules list but still a lot of spam is going
thru..
> Any extra rules you recommend adding?
> 
> 70_sare_adult.cf             70_sare_header1.cf          70_sare_html3.cf
> 71_sare_bml_pre25x.cf
> 70_sare_bayes_poison_nxm.cf  70_sare_header2.cf          70_sare_html4.cf
> 71_sare_redirect_pre3.0.0.cf
> 70_sare_genlsubj.cf          70_sare_header3.cf
70_sare_html_arc.cf
> 72_sare_bml_post25x.cf
> 70_sare_genlsubj0.cf         70_sare_header_arc.cf
70_sare_html_eng.cf
> 72_sare_redirect_post3.0.0.cf
> 70_sare_genlsubj1.cf         70_sare_header_eng.cf
70_sare_html_x30.cf
> 99_sare_fraud_post25x.cf
> 70_sare_genlsubj2.cf         70_sare_header_x264_x30.cf  70_sare_oem.cf
> 99_sare_fraud_pre25x.cf
> 70_sare_genlsubj3.cf         70_sare_header_x30.cf       70_sare_random.cf
> RulesDuJour
> 70_sare_genlsubj_arc.cf      70_sare_highrisk.cf
70_sare_specific.cf
> antidrug.cf
> 70_sare_genlsubj_eng.cf      70_sare_html.cf             70_sare_spoof.cf
> bigevil.cf
> 70_sare_genlsubj_x30.cf      70_sare_html0.cf            70_sare_unsub.cf
> bogus-virus-warnings.cf
> 70_sare_header.cf            70_sare_html1.cf            70_sare_uri.cf
> evilnumbers.cf
> 70_sare_header0.cf           70_sare_html2.cf            70_sc_top200.cf
> rules_du_jour
> 


Reply via email to