Re: Memory issues have forced me back to 2.64

[Andy Jezierski]

"Scott Palmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 11/08/2004 02:24:50 PM:

> Per everyone's recommendation I have removed the following .cf files from
> my /etc/mail/spamassassin directory:
>
> bigevil.cf
> bogus-virus-warnings.cf
> tripwire.cf
>
> and left the following:
> 70_sare_random.cf
> evilnumbers.cf
> antidrug.cf
> DomainDigits1.cf
>
> As far as I can tell those are all the "third party" rule sets. Indeed my
> memory usage dropped from 90mb to 36mb per child.
>
> Are all of those lists not needed anymore? Should I go ahead and remove
> the ones I left behind?
>
> Thanks! Scott
>
[snip]

Isn't antidrug part of 3.0 now?

My spamd processes are running about 46MB-52MB on average. Whoops, I take that back, they WERE running about that size under 3.0.0.  I just upgraded to 3.0.1 this morning, and now it looks like they start at about 46MB-48MB and seem to grow to about 70MB-72MB per child before being terminated and re-spawned. I kill them after 25 connections, may drop it down to 20 and see how my memory looks since I am seeing 80-90MB of swap space in use.

Here are the rules that I'm running.  Anyone spot any that I can get rid of?

70_sare_adult.cf
70_sare_bayes_poison_nxm.cf
70_sare_genlsubj0.cf
70_sare_genlsubj1.cf
70_sare_genlsubj_eng.cf
70_sare_header0.cf
70_sare_header1.cf
70_sare_html0.cf
70_sare_html1.cf
70_sare_html_eng.cf
70_sare_oem.cf
70_sare_random.cf
70_sare_specific.cf
70_sare_spoof.cf
72_sare_bml_post25x.cf
72_sare_redirect_post3.0.0.cf
88_FVGT_body.cf
88_FVGT_headers.cf
88_FVGT_subject.cf
88_FVGT_uri.cf
99_FVGT_Tripwire.cf
99_sare_fraud_post25x.cf
backhair.cf
bogus-virus-warnings.cf
chickenpox.cf
evilnumbers.cf
init.pre
local.cf
mangled.cf
weeds.cf

Andy