On Nov 14 at 21:28, Matt Kettler spoke: > Defintiely custom. > > FVGT_TRIPWIRE_* are add-on rules, and are not a part of the standard SA set. > TW_* are also add-on rules. In fact, I suspect they are a duplicate of the > same ruleset, but with different names. > LOCAL_OBFU generic is a local customization. And a heavy hitter at 1.8 > points. > SARE_HEAD_XBEEN is an add-on. > > The only "standard" rule in the list of hits is BAYES_00, a nonspam rule.
Ok, thanks for explaining. If add-ons are added should the `required' level be increased in order to prevent to much false positives? > > > As for James's concern about 9.9 vs 10.2 score, that much is easily Well this is some 3%. This doesn't bother me. What bothers me is that a non-spam message is tagged 9.9 while the required level is 4.0. This is some 200%. [...] > Round numbers are just that.. Adding lots of round numbers makes for a lot > of rounding error. Is that to say if there are lots of items which may produce rounding errors the `required' level should be increased accordingly? -Hanspeter
