On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 10:11:12AM -0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > if I did not miss anything in this thread, the victim HAS a static IP on the > cable/dsl link and > pays more for the access than dynamic ip would cost with the same provider. > The provider, however, reports a full ip block (which may have a few percent > of > static ip's) as dialup. > I believe the extra money they get on the fixed ip should allow them to > - either report correctly or > - create a mail relay where authenticated users can use their own domain name > as sender > > Wolfgang Hamann
I think he has a dynamic IP over a DSL line. That's what I understood. Am I wrong? Nicolas, Paris. -- --- OxStOnE -------------- O - Z750 & Linux ------- ._ /\_> --- Powered ---------- (x)> (x) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
