Ronan wrote: > Which one will be better suited to SA? I know SA is more cpu/ram than > disk IO so im leaning more toward the AMD approach. The reason there are > 2 machines of each is because im gonna implement fail over using > heartbeat.
Depending on your setup, you can probably do without heartbeat. Why not just have simple 50/50 load-sharing? We have a 64-node SA cluster working like this - only individual servers such as the master node run in an HA setup. -- Per Jessen, Zurich Let your spam stop here -- http://www.spamchek.com
