Oddly enough, we went up head-to-head with our SpamAssassin solution
against Brightmail three times in a row and won the customer every time.
This is running 2.64. We have a single 8-way 3500, but we'll probably be
upgrading that soon.
David.
-----
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004, Damian Mendoza wrote:
We sell BrightMail to customers that want a "Commercial" antispam
solution and have deep pockets to pay a yearly subscription. We build SA
based solutions (http://www.spamgate.us) for customers that want a
"low-cost" antispam solution.
Regards,
Damian
________________________________
From: Gray, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 8:59 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Brightmail
Brightmail seems to be getting a lot of good press on the SPAM front.
So I'm wondering, why do people running large mail systems choose SA
over corporate offerings. Is it cost? Is it configurability, or
performance?
Can anyone shed any light on how Brightmail achieves the rather
impressive statistics it is quoting, or do you think it is just smoke
and mirrors?
Is it possible to reproduce the other features without spending the
cash?
---------------------------------------------------
This email from dns has been validated by dnsMSS Managed Email Security
and is free from all known viruses.
For further information contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
