The ones that get through have bayes poison at the bottom. It did hit a couple of the SARE rules that look for bayes poison, but didn't score enough to kill it.
Very well crafted. <<Dan>> > -----Original Message----- > From: Evan Platt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 4:53 PM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: Image Composition Analysis > > Smart,Dan said: > > Messagelabs made a big deal of their option of using First 4 > > Internet's Image Composition Analysis tool to detect pornographic > > images. Is anyone in the open source world working on something > > similar. > > > > Catching image only E-mail with pornographic images is > really difficult. > > My > > users are offended when they get one, and wonder how I > could not catch it. > > Explaining that the document was text, filled with bayes > poison, and > > the one porn image with no porn words in the document > doesn't seem to > > have much of an impression on them. > > Well, I'm only a interested end user, not a admin, nor could > I set up SA if my job depended on it, however I did assist > in the configuration a year ago.... Isn't there a rule for > something like "Image only" e-mails with no text in them? > Modify that rule for additional points, so if a e-mail > consists of a image only it will score higher. I mean > granted, there will be the occasional message from their > friend with "Here's a picture of my new son" that's possibly > a FP, but that should be few and far between. > > Just my .02. > > Evan > >
