-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am Montag, 20. Dezember 2004 16:41 schrieb Jerry Bell: > There's a big review of anti-spam products at nw fusion here: > http://www.nwfusion.com/reviews/2004/122004spampkg.html?ts > Here's a bit on spamassassin: > http://www.nwfusion.com/reviews/2004/122004spamside6.html > > It's a pretty disappointing article. > > Jerry > http://www.syslog.org
I agree that a lot in this article about spamassassin is bs. Nou but. I'm using SA since a few days and had no problems. I bought a book from O'Reiley about SA and had not trouble in upgrading from 2.6.4 to 3.01 and now 3.0.2. Rule writing is not very difficult, so I'm writing my own rules and for mails which still got through. But I'm not near at 100%. Some mails are flagged as spam because of sorted recipients but after lowering the score or whitelisting the sender in procmailrc this is solved. My opinion is that SA is easy to use and integrate. Thomas - -- icq:133073900 aim:tawhv -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFByGAtHe2ZLU3NgHsRArqUAJwNsmgf2QwbbmkhRAebMN+1BMu2EACfdDAG o7wgGnGYOkYt+RBphjxa9pg= =TB7g -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
