-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am Mittwoch, 29. Dezember 2004 01:03 schrieb Paul J Fries: > I was thinking, would it be feasible to have an option for spamassassin > to exit after a message reached the spam threshold? > > You would need to run all of the negative scoring (non-spammy) rules > first, and then start running the positive scoring tests. Then once the > message reached the spam threshold, mark it as spam, and move on to the > next one. The idea is that you would not have to run every single > negative scoring test on every message. This should save some CPU > cycles.
But one way would be to order the rules by negative and positive scores and check if its possible that the remaining checks with negative scores can get the message score below the threshold (spam / autolearn). If not, bail out. But you would loose statistical data. There are a lot of rules. Maybe it would not save much processing cycles. For proper working of the baysian filter you should reach the auto_learn threshold. Regards Thomas Arend [] > Thanks! > > Regards, > Paul Fries > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - -- icq:133073900 http://www.t-arend.de -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFB0lFGHe2ZLU3NgHsRAjl1AJ9NlbW4UeTuj1/O53AMkDsfvvxvuQCdEYI6 3sXZh+5kjrKoV2Lci0qCmVk= =ISeK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
