Justin Mason wrote: > we're already supporting two versions -- trunk and 3.0.x. 2.6x as well > would be very painful, but a "maintainance team" who want to do that would > be welcome to do so ;)
So the question is - what is the need for maintaining 2.64? Show of hands, who's still on 2.64 with no exact plans to upgrade? -- Per Jessen, Zurich Let your spam stop here -- http://www.spamchek.com
