From: "Raymond Dijkxhoorn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi!
>
> > Very anecdotal, but of the last 20 messages scored as spam, only 1 of
them
> > did not hit on any SURBL's. On a daily basis about 2 or 3 per user, out
> > of an average of 200 to 300 non-spam messages delivered, were diagnosed
as
> > non-spam, and were not registered in the SURBL when delievered, but when
> > manually checked later, their offending URL's had been registered in at
> > least one, and often several, SURBL's. SURBL's are definitely workling.
>
> We are working on even getting them added faster. Some parts of WS and
> some parts of JP are allready updating more often. Some pill spammers wont
> like this ;)
>
> Its good that you look if its added allready, since only with THOSE
> submissions we can add more on the lists ... :)
>
> Bye,
> Raymond
I have an idea for automatically listing emailed submissions. Suppose
the submissions IDs were checked via whois for who owns the domain.
If it is a name recognized as a spammer automatically list it pending
review of the site.
Another annoyingly difficult thing to do would be to wget from the
URLs in the email and compare the pages against spam pages at the
content level. I'm not sure this is as good an idea as the first one
since it could accidentally list legitimate businesses.
{^_^}
