I'm sticking with 2.6 for now too, because I can't just upgrade to Perl 5.8 because FreeBSD 4.10 doesn't have Perl 5.8 in the base system, and my system is too fragile to just upgrade Perl without days worth of headaches. :\
Tim Gustafson MEI Technology Consulting, Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] (516) 379-0001 Office (516) 480-1870 Mobile/Emergencies (516) 908-4185 Fax http://www.meitech.com/ -----Original Message----- From: Martin Hepworth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 11:09 AM Cc: SpamAssassin list Subject: Re: maintaining the 2.6 branch and me..no had time to upgrade thus far and 2.64 does a very nice job.. -- Martin Hepworth Snr Systems Administrator Solid State Logic Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300 John Hardin wrote: > On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 00:54, Per Jessen wrote: > >>Ron Johnson wrote: >> >> >>>>Per Jessen wrote: >>>> >>>>> Show of hands, >>>>>who's still on 2.64 with no exact plans to upgrade? >> >>Alright, so far I've seen 4-5, maybe 6 people saying they intend to stick to >>2.64 for the foreseeable future. Is that really all? > > > <aol> > Me too. > </aol> > > ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses and is believed to be clean. **********************************************************************
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
