On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 03:33:31PM +0000, Matthew Newton wrote: > > I suppose my other options then, if it is worth it, is to just rely on > the database from one machine and copy to the other two machines once a > day/month/(choose favourite time period here). Or maybe the three > machines can send all spam learn requests to the SA running on one > machine? > > The other, perhaps better, option is that I just run any manual learning > on all three machines to update all their databases, and ignore > automatically learned differences between them. >
You could have them share a database via SQL on a seperate box. That would accomplish several things, 1) shared database amoung all of your spamd machines, 2) remove the IO load from your spamd boxes, 3) be really really cool. Michael
pgpjDZjg60E5X.pgp
Description: PGP signature
