Are you saying that using spamd/c gives you problems for users who have their own local rules? Just curious as to what problem?
--Chris >-----Original Message----- >From: jdow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 1:19 PM >To: users@spamassassin.apache.org >Subject: Re: SARE rules timing out? > > >The usual solution is more memory. >You need to tell us what version of SpamAssassin you are running, how >much memory you have in the machine, and how you are using SpamAssassin >including the options. Your mail load will also make a difference. > >The SARE rules do consume a lot of memory. But they do not cause the >machine to bog down terribly. A typical "spamassassin -t" run here is >about 2.7 seconds on a 2G Athlon with a gig of memory. That is one of >the more "brutal" ways to run spamassassin, though. spamc->spamd was >under half that time. (I have a peculiar problem with per user rules >with that configuration so I do not use it.) > >{^_^} >----- Original Message ----- >From: "MIKE YRABEDRA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> Does anyone know if any of the SARE rules are causing >timeouts? My server >> was bogging down really bad. I removed the custom rules and >that seems to >> have fixed it. Only thing is, I don't know which one is causing the >problem. > >
