On Friday, January 7, 2005, 8:43:30 AM, Jerry Jerry wrote: > I currently use the spamcop RBL..
to you mean bl.spamcop.net or sc.surbl.org. The two are not the same. > This morning I had 96 spam messages. 77 were detected by SA. Do you mean an 80% detection rate? That's not too bad, though it can be improved. Jeff C. __ > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "David Groce" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Jerry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: "spam" <users@spamassassin.apache.org> > Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 6:53 PM > Subject: Re: Too much spam getting through... Sharing rules or db's? >> Basically SURBL's are shared DB's of spam identifying information. I put >> them on my 2.6x install with the SpamCop plugin and I don't have to worry >> about spam anymore. I can't say it's 100% but I would guess about 98% >> effective from the people I have talked to. This is on a mailserver with >> about 1000 users and spam filtering on all accounts. >> >> David Groce >> Network Administrator >> North Kitsap School District >>> Hi, >>> >>> We are getting a lot of spam messages coming through with low scores. >>> Anyone have any special rule sets that would be interested in sharing? I >>> use the rules de jour to update my rules but it doesn't seem to capture >>> all >>> the spam. >>> >>> Also, Is there like a public shared Bayesian database that can help >>> improve >>> the detection of spam messages? >>> >>> TIA >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> David Groce >> North Kitsap School District >> Network Server Analyst/Coordinator >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> (360) 394-2621 Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.surbl.org/
