On Sun, Jan 09, 2005 at 11:41:27AM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote: > But wait, SA 2.x did not have SURBL support!
That is true for the default installation; however, I added SURBL to my 2.63 (or 2.64, don't remember) without headaches. >From my experience, it is the best way to have a perl installation dedicated to SA only (that is easy, as long as you have different pathes for different perls) and then to build a recent SA from source. Going this way, the system's packages are not affected, and I have an up to date SA. Of course, other people's mileage may vary. Rainer
