On Wednesday, January 12, 2005, 3:20:17 AM, Darren Coleman wrote: > Hi, > I'm running the latest version of SpamAssassin (3.0.2), with a healthy > Bayes database (I believe) and pretty much all of the available rules > from rulesemporium.com and I have noticed recently, particularly from > comments from my users, that SA is missing a lot of clear spasm.
> I have attached one for reference which scored only 4.0 on my system > despite having clear, unobfuscated references to two notable erectile > dysfunction drugs. > Can anyone tell me where I'm going wrong with this? > Thanks, > Darren Try installing a current Net::DNS and enabling network tests. SURBL and other URIBL rules triggered on the URIs in your spam: URIBL_AB_SURBL,URIBL_SBL,URIBL_SC_SURBL,URIBL_WS_SURBL Those should be plenty to get them marked as spam. Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.surbl.org/
