Martin Hepworth wrote: > Another reason.... [snip] > I shall be sticking to 2.64 for the forsee-able future as 3.02 gives me > no advantage and quite a high likelihood of more spam dropping through > the system!
Not specific to Martins reply, but thanks to all the responses regarding continued use of SA2.64. I'd like to be able to offer to take on 2.64 maintenance (with the help of others), but I would simply be biting over too much. For the moment anyway. One thing that occurred to me just now - some of the problems we've discussed, like the FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK, are purely to do with the rulesets/-definitions. Has any thought been given to producing separate "packages" for SA code and SA rules? For 2.6 or 3.0? Along the lines of what ClamAV does perhaps. /Per Jessen, Zürich -- http://www.spamchek.com/freetrial - sign up for your free 30-day trial now! http://www.spamchek.de/freetrial - jetzt für 30 Tage ausprobieren - kostenlos und unverbindlich! http://www.spamchek.dk/freetrial - 30 dages gratis prøvetid - helt uden forpligtelser!
