>> Why is the WS FP rate still that high? Yes it catches the most spam,
>> but please please please report ANY FPs you get right away. It needs
>> to be under .10 in my mind. If we don't do this soon, I will start
>> taking plates of nachos hostage. You don't want to know what I'll do
>> to them!!
>
>I don't want to report false positives used in the SA training corpus
>because that will bias the scores to be too high because our results
>will be much more accurate than any random person out there.

Ah....that is understandible. 

>I've sent Jeff and the SURBL lists lots of additional sources of
>potential domains to whitelist and I'm trying to track down additional
>juicy data.  Use those instead of sacrificing the scores by 
>making SURBL
>_look_ perfect.  :-)

LOL, yeah we've been looking into those. I've got a few more myself to look
into. I'll get that rate down...just you wait and see ;) 

--Chris
(D.Q. has forced me to kill a plate of nachos! Damn you D.Q. those nachos
had families!) 

Reply via email to