Jeff Chan wrote:
On Wednesday, December 8, 2004, 8:22:24 AM, Matthew Romanek wrote:

FYI (and for future list-searchers), the problem with URIDNSBL
appearing to work but not actually scoring was because the host's
resolv.conf included 127.0.0.1, which apparently something doesn't
like.


One possibility is that some code has 127.0.0.1 as
a "bad" address.  In particular this is one reason
why RBLs usually don't list 127.0.0.1 as a result
code, which could clearly break things where the
loopback address appears in message headers, for
example.  Just a WAG for someone to check in future.

Glad to hear you got things working!

Jeff C.

use 0.0.0.0 instead of 127.0.0.1, or better, an IP of one of the physical interfaces. there seems to be a bug with sock_dgram code.

Reply via email to