On Tuesday 08 February 2005 07:58 pm, John Andersen wrote: > On Monday 07 February 2005 08:08 am, Timothy Richter wrote: > > Good Morning, > > > > Recently, we upgraded from Spamassassin 2.61 to 3.0.2. Guinevere is on > > version 2.17. Our threshold had been 4.9, and we typically blocked 60% of > > our mail as being spam. > > > > Since the upgrade, we are blocking less than have of our email as being > > spam. I have taught the Bayesian filter another 600 spam and 600 ham > > messages, adjusted the Bayesian filter scores, and dropped the threshold > > down to 2.9. We are still catching much less spam then with the older > > version. > > > > Does anyone have advice on improving Spamassassin? > > > > > > Spamassassin is installed on Server 2003 and is being invoked by > > Guinevere 2.17. > > V3 relies heavily on DNS tests (perhaps too heavily) if you tell > it that they are installed. > > If they really don't work you're worse off than > you would be by just not installing them. > > I've found that all the st0ck pushers are really beating > SA 3.0.2.
And note that this message did not hit ANY St0ck scam tests...!!?? -- _____________________________________ John Andersen
pgpbhP1X40B1R.pgp
Description: signature
