That's MailScanner; I'm suggesting that if you look to see if it was processed through SA or not (MS might be skipping if no processes are available, or might be using the wrong queue, or any number of other things could be going wrong).
On 2/25/2005 6:51 PM, Jerome Cartagena wrote: > MailScanner does alter the Raw headers of each mail message and I can > verify that each message does not get delivered to the user's INBOX > until it has been processed. > > ~Jerome Cartagena > > > On Feb 25, 2005, at 11:28 AM, Eric A. Hall wrote: > > >>On 2/25/2005 2:00 PM, Jerome Cartagena wrote: >> >> >>>according to the graphs, the number of detected spam has a steady >>>upper >>>limit while the actual number of undetected spam fluctuates wildly. >> >>Can you tell if the undetected spam is getting processed (I like to tag >>all mail regardless of score). >> >>>From your sentence above it sounds like you don't have enough processes >>for the volume and the overflow mail is taking a shortcut. >> >>-- >>Eric A. Hall >>http://www.ehsco.com/ >>Internet Core Protocols >>http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coreprot/ >> > > -- Eric A. Hall http://www.ehsco.com/ Internet Core Protocols http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coreprot/
